Problem Statement
Context:
Doctors needed a clinical tool to evaluate oncology medications with AI-driven insights.
Sales teams required a Power BI-powered dashboard to track medication adoption and supply chain efficiency.
Core Challenge:
Design two distinct user experiences (clinical app vs. sales dashboard) that align with their workflows while ensuring safety, accuracy, and scalability.
User Research & Insights
Methodology
Shadowing & Interviews:
Observed 15+ oncologists in clinics/hospitals to map their decision-making workflows.
Interviewed 20+ sales reps to understand how they use Power BI dashboards.
Blind Testing:
Tested skeuomorphic vs. flat design prototypes with doctors.
Tested data visualization styles (charts, maps, tables) with sales teams.
Key Findings
Doctors:
Preferred skeuomorphic design (e.g., elevated cards, tactile buttons) that mimics physical tools (e.g., pill bottles, lab reports).
Needed clear AI boundaries—no open-ended prompts due to patient privacy concerns.
Sales Teams:
Felt most comfortable with Power BI-style dashboards (color-coded KPIs, drillable maps).
Prioritized speed over novelty—wanted instant access to sales trends and regional performance.
A neomorphic login interface that establishes security and sets a welcoming tone.
A neomorphic login interface that establishes security and sets a welcoming tone.
A clean, tactile overview where clinicians access patient information through intuitive cards.
A clean, tactile overview where clinicians access patient information through intuitive cards.
The core interaction hub—featuring a medicine drawer UI, embossed gauges, and secure confirm/dismiss actions for AI-driven med evaluations.
The core interaction hub—featuring a medicine drawer UI, embossed gauges, and secure confirm/dismiss actions for AI-driven med evaluations.
A Power BI-styled dashboard for the sales team, delivering real-time analytics through maps, charts, and color-coded KPIs.
A Power BI-styled dashboard for the sales team, delivering real-time analytics through maps, charts, and color-coded KPIs.
Design Process
A/B Testing & Iteration
Doctors’ App:
Tested 3 UI styles:
Skeuomorphic (winning): Raised buttons, embossed dials, and paper-like cards.
Flat Material Design: Rejected for feeling “too abstract.”
Hybrid: Mixed feedback; users missed tactile feedback.
Final Design:
Medicine drawer UI with tactile cards.
Embossed gauge for treatment effectiveness.
Confirm/dismiss buttons with glow animations.
Sales Dashboard:
Built directly in Power BI to match their existing workflows.
Key additions:
Clickable world map for regional sales breakdowns.
Weekly treatment stats table with drill-down to e-prescription logs.
Agile Sprints
Ran 2-week sprints with cross-functional teams:
Sprint 1: Core flows (patient list → medication evaluation).
Sprint 3: AI integration (O1 Mini API + hallucination guardrail).
Sprint 6: Final UI polish + accessibility testing.

Process Diagram: A flow chart or timeline showcasing the agile sprints and iterative design steps.

AI Integration & Guardrails
Why OpenAI O1 Mini?
Speed & Cost: Needed fast, affordable responses for real-time medication evaluations.
Accuracy: Better at structured data (e.g., matching biomarkers to drug profiles) than open-ended Q&A.
Safety Process
No Direct Prompts: Limited AI to evaluating pre-defined medication options (no free text input).
Verification Layer:
Trained a subprocess to cross-check AI outputs against a curated drug database.
Flagged mismatches (e.g., drug contraindications) for manual review.Result: Zero false positives in clinical trials; AI became a trusted “second opinion.”
AI Verification Flow: diagram that maps the data flow from input → O1 Mini API → validation → output.
Development & Collaboration
Cross-Functional Teams:
Collaborated with oncologists to validate UI metaphors (e.g., representing “treatment phases” as timelines).
Partnered with sales operations to align dashboard metrics (e.g., using “e-prescription logs” for supply chain planning).
Tech Stack:
Frontend: React Native (app), Power BI (dashboard).
AI: OpenAI O1 Mini with custom validation logic.

Impact & Results
Clinical Side
Patient Outcomes:
30% faster medication evaluation for doctors.
15% fewer adverse reactions due to AI-flagged contraindications.
Adoption:
85% of pilot doctors requested a full rollout.
Sales & Supply Chain
Revenue Growth:
20% increase in medication sales within 6 months (attributed to improved demand forecasting).
40% reduction in stockouts via enhanced e-prescription tracking.
User Satisfaction:
90% of sales reps rated the dashboard as “significantly more actionable” than previous tools.
Lessons Learned
Design for Workflow, Not Trends:
Although skeuomorphic design may seem retro, it was critical for doctor adoption and ease of use.
AI Is a Tool, Not a Crutch:
Limiting AI’s scope ensured safety and reliability.
Dual Audiences Need Dual Strategies:
Tailoring the interface for medics and sales teams validated the importance of context in design.

You may also like

Back to Top